Archive | 2012

Bankruptcy and Litigation

After a decade of litigation and related bankruptcy, Jacqueline Palank of the Wall Street Journal wrote on the question of who owns the song, “Whoomp! (There It Is)”.

This song is familiar to anyone who attended a sporting event in the ’90s. Released in 1993, “Whoomp! (There It Is)” was one of those ubiquitous pump-up-the-crowd songs played during sporting events, a status cemented by its inclusion on the first volume of “Jock Jams.” It was later declared the 65th worst-song-ever, surrounded by such other ’90s gems as “How Bizarre” by OMC, “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” by Deep Blue Something and “Supermodel (You Better Work)” by RuPaul.

To decide this matter, Judge Richard A. Schell of the U.S. District Court in Sherman, Texas, scheduled a hearing for Aug. 27. This is when a jury will be selected for a trial over which of two music companies is the true owner.

In 1993, Alvertis Isbell’s Bellmark Records released “Whoomp! (There It Is),” by one-hit wonder Tag Team. According to Isbell, the record label owned the sound recording of the song, while its affiliated publishing company, Alvert Music, owned the composition rights to the song’s written form.

However, DM Records licensed “Whoomp! (There It Is)” in 1997. Bellmark filed for bankruptcy protection the same year. In 1999, Bellmark sold most of its assets, including its sound recording rights, to DM Records. According to Isbell, the composition rights weren’t included in that sale because they are an asset of Alvert, which wasn’t in bankruptcy.

According to Isbell, DM has been wrongly claiming ownership of both the song’s sound and composition rights. Isbell is seeking a ruling that Alvert Music still owns the composition rights, and also wants damages for DM’s alleged infringement on his ownership rights.

DM Records, however, says written agreements do not mention him or Alvert Music by name, and therefore don’t distinguish between the two types of song rights. As a result, both were assets of Bellmark and therefore included among the assets DM Records bought from Bellmark’s bankruptcy.

After a decade of litigation, the parties asked Schell to rule on the dispute without a trial. The judge denied the request Friday stating, “Because there are genuine issues of material fact surrounding ownership of the subject composition copyrights, the court denies both DM and Isbell’s motions for summary judgment.”

Many experts believe that we may be headed for another recession. Don’t enter a second recession with mountains of debt. I can help you to understand the options available to you for dealing with your debts. I am sure that I can be of assistance to you, to a family member, or to a friend as we all know people experiencing trouble these days even if we are not experiencing our own financial troubles. Please do not hesitate to make contact with me. I emphasize courteous and discrete consultations that fill your time with useful information. The impact to your life after an in-person consultation with me may be substantial, and life-long. You will enjoy a new peace of mind and a fresh hope for the future with a new roadmap for financial success that we develop together. You can contact my scheduler through our website for your free 30 minute consultation. If you wish, you may schedule your free 30 minute consultation by phone by calling us at 253-383-1001 Monday through Thursday from 9:00 AM until 5:45 PM, and on Friday from 9:00 AM until 12 noon.

If the best interest rates are from banks, credit unions, or savings and loans with low Bankrate.com Safe & Sound Ratings, does it make sense to go for high yields when the bank is potentially at risk?

An article I found on Bankrate.com discussed the truth about risky banks and their interest rates on certificates of deposit. When looking for the best CD rates, every tenth of a percentage point of yield makes a difference. This is especially true right now, when interest rates are at a historic low.

The answer is that it depends. “Technically, consumers have nothing to worry about as long as they stay under FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) limits, which are $250,000 through 2013,” says Robert Laura, a financial adviser and president of Financial IQ in Farmington, Michigan. According to the FDIC website, a CD that matures after Dec. 31, 2013, would have its insured limit reverted back to $100,000, except for certain types of retirement accounts.

The FDIC website states that if you have more than the current limits to invest, it may be better to break up your CD purchases by buying CDs from different institutions to stay under deposit insurance amounts. That being said, should you invest in a CD and the institution fails, the FDIC is required to make good on your investment as soon as possible. This can involve transferring your CD to the institution that acquired the failed bank or sending you a check for the balance due on your CD.

The FDIC website also has information on what happens if your CD is worth more than deposit insurance limits, and your bank fails. If this happens, you may receive some or none of that balance at a later date, depending on whether the FDIC is able to sell the failed bank’s assets and at what price. The FDIC provides frequently asked questions on federal deposit insurance.

Bryan Hopkins, CPA, CFP and president of Hopkins Wealth Management in Anaheim Hills, California states, while the FDIC generally makes good on insured deposits quickly, it’s wise to have other liquid funds in an insured checking or savings account elsewhere. “It could take as long as 90 days to get your money, so it’s a good idea to have funds elsewhere to cover day-to-day expenses,” he says.

Though deposits are currently insured up to $250,000, it does make sense to pay attention to safety and soundness criteria, such as Bankrate’s Safe & Sound ratings. These ratings evaluate a bank based on an individual institution’s capital adequacy, asset quality, profitability and liquidity.

“Psychologically, a bank’s ratings are important and consumers should use them,” says Bryan Hopkins. “Most consumers, especially older ones, remember the Great Depression. While bank failures are handled very differently now than they were then, nobody wants it to be the case where things don’t go smoothly, and have their money be in limbo for months.”

CD rates for banks with lower Bankrate Safe & Sound Ratings may be higher than those with higher ratings because those banks may be trying to build up their deposit base by offering higher yields through brokers to consumers. In early December, one-year CD rates varied from 0.5 percent from a bank with a four-star Safe & Sound Rating, to 2.08 percent from a bank with a one-star Safe & Sound Rating. However, there were several banks with one, two, three, and four star safety and soundness ratings offering CD rates from 1.7 percent to 1.99 percent.

Lower-rated banks don’t always offer higher rates than banks with higher ratings, so it is always a good idea to “shop around”. Some higher-yielding CDs may come with higher minimum deposit requirements, and some banks may be seeking deposits with a particular maturity. These banks may offer better terms on some CDs than others.

In many cases, the difference between higher yielding CD rates and lower yielding rates isn’t much. For example, if you buy a $10,000, one-year CD with a 1.9 percent interest rate, compounded daily, you’ll earn $191.81 in interest. If you buy the same CD at a lower rate, 1.6 percent, you’ll earn $161.28—a $30.63 difference.

Do credit reporting bureaus ever make mistakes?

A recent article posted on KOMO News online site, discussed a 2009 California class action lawsuit that challenged credit-reporting bureaus TransUnion, Equifax, and Experian with improperly reporting debts that had been discharged in bankruptcy. The defendants (the credit-reporting bureaus) eventually came to a settlement with the plaintiffs to the tune of $45 million.

The court approved the settlement by issuing an Order Granting Final Approval, but on August 12, 2011, the defendants filed a brief challenging that order. Their challenge is in regards to attorney fees and costs of the case. The reason for the article was to remind readers of the case, because the result of this appeal won’t be known until sometime later this year. The deadline for Appellants to file relevant briefs with the court is January 23, 2012, and Appellees have until February 24, 2012.

The lawsuit was brought on because Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion improperly reported debts that had been discharged in bankruptcy on consumers’ credit reports. Rather than accurately noting that these debts were “discharged through bankruptcy”, the credit bureaus noted that they were “120 days late” or that they had been charged off by the credit issuer.

Incorrectly reporting the status of a debt is illegal, but it also caused a lot of grief for the people affected. This mistake consequently made these debts appear to still be active. When a debt is still reported as active, debt collectors may try to collect on that debt.

The result was that people who had filed for bankruptcy precisely to eliminate their debts and stop getting harassed by debt collectors, had to deal with them anyway.

There are a group of petitioners that are eligible to collect on the settlement that are being represented by this case. To be a member of that group, petitioners had to have received a Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge AND a credit report issued by one or more of the defendants between March 15, 2002 and May 11, 2009 with incorrectly reported debts. They also must have submitted a claim form with relevant information by November 30, 2009.

Even though the settlement amount seems large, it will be spread out over so many individuals that it likely won’t result to more than a few dollars per person.

Is there anything I can do about a student loan that has defaulted?

College Graduates are Shackled to Student Loan Debt

Typically once your loan enters default status, the lender requires you to pay off the remaining loan balance in its entirety in one lump sum.

However, the U.S. Department of Education has a loan rehabilitation program to bring defaulted student loans current. There are several reasons as to why you should take advantage of this program. When you enter into the program, risk of wage garnishment ends, and the IRS will no longer be able to withhold your income tax refunds.

Additional advantages take place after you have completed the loan rehabilitation program. The loan will no longer be in default status and will be considered current. Furthermore, the negative credit reports to the three national credit bureaus associated with the loan will be deleted. You will now also regain eligibility for the benefits that were originally available on your loans before the loan defaulted. These benefits may include deferment, forbearance, and Title IV eligibility.

There are some differences to the program depending on the type of loan that you are trying to rehabilitate. In all cases, you are required to make nine full, on-time payments of an agreed amount within twenty days of their monthly due dates to the Department of Education.

The aforementioned differences have to do with the lender who services your loan after you complete the program. A Direct Loan will be returned to the Direct Loan Servicing Center, a FFEL Loan may be purchased by an eligible lending institution, and a Perkins Loan will be serviced by the Department of Education until the loan balance is paid off.

Some things to keep in mind:

Payments secured through involuntary means, such as wage garnishment or litigation, cannot be counted towards your nine payments.
You are only allowed to perform loan rehabilitation once per loan. That means if your loan falls back into default, you will have few if any options, and you will more than likely be responsible for the remaining balance in full.